Eurocalypse 101: Three articles for understanding where we’re at

For real this time!

The eurozone crisis appears to be heading towards some kind of climax. Haven’t we heard this before? Like ahead of every eurosummit of past two years? While a truly “decisive” solution appears impossible almost by definition given the nature of the European Council (vetoes/Germany), we are getting at a point where either the politicians actually change business as usual or everything falls apart. Or both.

Borrowing costs are rising across the eurozone, including “virtuous” governments like Austria and Finland, with even Germany now being forced to pay more than the UK. It is now clear Italy – if Brussels-Frankfurt-Berlin do nothing – will enter a debt spiral and default on its over €1.5 trillion of debt no matter what the new entirely-unelected government of bureaucrats in Rome does (and, no, actually crying while announcing your €30+ billion austerity cuts doesn’t help), dragging the European financial system down with it in the process.

If staring into the abyss of financial collapse has a way of focusing the mind, so does the fact that the eurozone’s (Merkel’s) dithering non-policies and repeated pseudo-solutions mean that Europe has effectively already entered a double-dip recession, with unemployment rising to 10.3%, the highest recorded since the euro’s founding, even as the U.S.’s has dropped to 8.6%. This, for a young European like myself whose generation faces over 20% unemployment, verges on criminal negligence.

We appear to be at a tipping point for EU leaders with for the first time serious talks of legal fiscal controls to be imposed from Brussels and, less certain, of decisive intervention by the European Central Bank. History, as José Manuel Barroso recently said, is “accelerating”. Economic disaster is getting palpably close and the eurozone appears to be on the verge of a major political transformation. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Still the whole remains hideously complicated. What exactly is going on? I thought I’d highlight three long articles which, though not the most recent, explain the stakes (all worth reading in full).

Economics editor of Bloomberg/Businessweek Peter Coy analyzes the eurozone’s state and searches for the roots of German policy. Basically, according to Coy, the Lady is not for turning. Merkel will not yield on eurobonds or the ECB, though current German policy is “fighting against more than a century of central banking theory and practice,” and her proposed reforms neither address the current crisis nor will take effect soon enough.

In addition, it’s not clear that Merkel has either a strategy or a clear conception of the crisis. “If Merkel were thinking strategically, she probably wouldn’t risk the European economy falling into a recession,” he says. Conclusion: “The paradox at the heart of the crisis in Europe is that Merkel’s fetish for stability has become deeply destabilizing.”

Veteran financial reporter for EUobserver Leigh Phillips has let loose in a massive 4,500-word op-ed (really an essay) mapping out how the eurozone crisis has eroded European democracy. Here too there is little to celebrate: Brussels is about to take control of national budgets from elected parliaments and, where no majority for austerity exists, governments of non-neutral Brussels-Frankfurt men of confidence are imposed (“Keynesian experts need not apply.”).

Favorite quote: “At the birth of the United States, the more egalitarian Thomas Jefferson, believed in equality of political opportunity (admittedly only to white males) and favoured ‘plain folk’ and the ‘yeoman farmer’ over the ‘cesspools of corruption’ inhabited by financiers, bankers and industrialists.” The latter presumably referring today to the unelected eurocrats-cum-Goldman Sachs alumni now running Greece, Italy and the ECB.

Finally Ezra Klein over at Wonkblog provides lots of graphs describing near every aspect of the crisis, including sovereign bond spreads, bank exposure, industrial trends and scenarios for crisis resolution/eurozone breakup. Because we’re visual animals, you know? (Incidentally, Wonkblog looks like it has the most comprehensive coverage of the crisis in general.)

All in all, pessimism still seems warranted. Berlin looks to not be ready to do what it takes to save the economy but Brussels does look set to rob us of much of our democracy. Perhaps the summit will surprise us, but as it stands, it seems we are set for more costly, compromising eurocratic halfassedness. Hélas !

This entry was posted in article and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Eurocalypse 101: Three articles for understanding where we’re at

  1. marknesop says:

    Fellow European Alexander Mercouris has an interesting piece today, in which he suggests the UK has been essentially expelled from the EU.

    http://mercouris.wordpress.com/2011/12/10/britains-expulsion-from-the-eu-and-the-death-of-europe/

    Sent home with a rupture, as the New-York-Italian street kids used to say a generation ago. The EU may have to put its dreams of being greatly influential in the world on the back burner, while it heals itself – if it can. Mercouris suggests it is frankly impossible.

    As has been said so many times before when something meant to last proved to be an illusion – how did it come to this?

  2. Craig Willy says:

    I agree with Mercouris that the new deal is basically irrelevant and, in the current circumstances, impossible to implement. For all the “drama” of the summit, EU leaders rejected in advance measures (ECB intervention, Eurobonds) which might solve the crisis *even if a good fiscal compact was reached*. The laws and constitutions can say whatever they like but the budgetary situation will not improve if, following existing trends, unemployment continues to rise, recession returns and Italy defaults, then what will have been the point?

    I’m not sure how big a deal Cameron’s move is. In and of itself, it’s not really significant as the compact concerned eurozone states. We’ll have to see if the UK will be frozen out of future conversations – e.g. when the British veto alone again a permanent EU military HQ – no doubt to French delight…

    • Lol. But Angela Murkel did say that the UK is a valued member and considering the UK is one of the strongest economies in the world, it’s not a good time for Europe to be alienating each other so I don’t think the UK will be frozen out in the future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s